Thanks for the feedback. A few points: 1. The model has gained enough 5-star ratings to warrant that it's not "junk". And the slicer image looks great, too. Not resin level, obviously, but that's how it is. 2. As I made clear, both in the description and the accompanying images of the final print, it's not a completely accurate depiction of the image. 3. I do think it's a good idea to add an image from the slicer, as you did. So I'll do that for future prints, and thank you for that.

seriously, u see ppl like it, so.. not junk, now u can say you would rether have more detailes, but serious man, learn how to speak in public.

Dude why don’t you just post the model it’s self and not the ai image it was based off of. The model is still good but posting a higher quality version as the main image is definitely deceiving. People obviously like it and the other models you’ve done as well.

Yep; low quality AI trash. Just like the rest of his stuff.

I'm using several AI engines to help in the creation of the model, followed by some CAD tinkering and tweaking to make sure the final print is good enough in my estimation. It's not an easy or a streamlined process (LOTS of flukes along the way), and I make sure to always print the final model, so I can be sure I'm happy with it, and so I can post the images here and people can know for certain what they're going to get at the end of the printing process. In the end, if people like it (and it looks like they do) and they gain some value from printing it (which, again, it seems they do), then all's good in my view.

It really isn't though. The only digital version of the model you post in photos is the AI photo and not the model itself followed by photos of prints that are blurry, odd angle, painted to hide lack of detail, far away, or a combination of all of the above. It's purposeful misrepresentation.

Thank you for the feedback, and congrats on the successful print (especially considering the material). I agree with your recommendation. Next time I'll add the picture of the precise model to the cover image. I'd hoped adding the photo of the printed figurine would be good enough, but evidently it doesn't convey the message clearly enough.

Yeah. I was surprised for sure. I saw your notes about source vs model and was very happy with a print that very closely matched what Bambu studio rendered. I live in Hawaii and humidity is a big issue. I gifted this dragon to my coworkers 4 year old son and he was thrilled.

t

Thank you for sharing that! Love the details and the additional coloring!

thank you for sharing the real quality of the model .. saves me wasting time and filament

very glad is a very nice file

As I wrote in the description, the final model isn't exactly like the one in the cover image. I've added several photos of the printed result, so people know what kind of result they'll get, including in the cover image itself. Full transparency here. In the end, if people like it (and it looks like they do) and they gain some value from printing it (which, again, it seems they do), then all's good in my view.

Very cool. Thanks for sharing!