XINGTONGZHILIAN Spool (183 mm) Adapter for Bambu Lab AMS by clavo

clavo

3D Printer>3D Printer Accessories

Print Profile(2)

All

X1 Carbon

P1S

P1P

X1E

0.2mm layer, 4 walls, 15% infill

Designer

36 min

1 plate

4.0(23)

100.38% Larger than original, perfect tight fit.

40 min

1 plate

4.8(15)

Open in Bambu Studio

Boost

204

356

Released

Description

Bought some filament of XINGTONGZHILIAN. The spools have a diameter of 18.3 cm and are wound up to the upper edge which causes an issue when the AMS rewinds the filament (filament jumps from the spool).

Existing designs waste to much filament. So I have designed a filament-saving (very) tight-fit adapter that increases the diameter to 20 cm. Also added a lip on both inner sides so that it snaps into place.

Notes:

Printed with PLA (Overture PLA Matte).
Settings: .2 mm layer hight, .4 nozzle, 4 walls, 15% gyroid infill.
→ less than 20g per adapter (40g per spool)
To attach, place the adapter on one side and then press over the spool from both sides.
And it should be obvious that you need two adapters per spool ;)
Should also work with other spools that have a diameter of 18.3 cm

Comment & Rating (55)

@andrewcanali

Boosted

Print Profile

100.38% Larger than original, perfect tight fit.

excellent print in PLA. works perfectly. my first attempt to make these with PETG didn’t work out so well

@manzoldeglin

Boosted

Saved me a whole heap of dosh! A simple print, just having to use my debur tool on the inner face.

@user_3821268203

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 4 walls, 15% infill

very difficult to fit as they are extremely tight but then I guess they need to be. do the job really well.👍

@user_2536228971

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 4 walls, 15% infill

Hat leider bei mir nicht gepasst auf die selbe Rolle.

The designer has replied

@clavo

Schade, aber kein Grund deswegen 1 Stern zu geben. Am besten mal die Spule nachmessen, der Hersteller verwendet nämlich verschiedene Durchmesser. Dieses Modell ist für 183mm, es gibt aber auch Spulen mit 185mm. Abgesehen davon muss das Modell notwendigerweise sehr passgenau sein. Daher ist es wichtig, dass das Filament korrekt kalibriert ist und es muss, z.b. bei PETG und ASA, der Schrumpffaktor bedacht werden.

@user_2536228971

Replying to @clavo :

ich habe es in PLA gedruckt. ich denke auch dass dein Design nicht wirklich gut ist. Es ist bestimmt auch so ein Akt das da drauf zu machen. Diese Ringe haben noch nie bei mir gepasst bei keiner Rolle. Das beste wird halt sein es um zu spulen. 1 Stern war gerechtfertigt weil es schlicht nicht passt. Und wir reden hier nicht um 1 2 Zehntel.

@clavo

Replying to @user_2536228971 :

Wenn es nicht um 1 oder 2 Zehntel Millimeter geht, dann hat deine Spule sicher keine 183mm und entsprechend ist der eine Stern nicht gerechtfertigt. Ich habe im Titel sowie im Text geschrieben, dass es für 183mm bzw. 18.3cm Durchmesser ist. Du kannst deine Spule nachmessen und das Modell dann entsprechend skalieren (nur X- und Y-Achse. Die Z-Achse sollte gleich bleiben). Solltest du 183mm messen, dann solltest du mal deinen Drucker checken, erst recht wenn die Passgenauigkeit bei anderen Adaptern zuvor auch schon immer ein Problem war.

(Edited)

@b4rryo

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 4 walls, 15% infill

Great print, but I could not for the life of me get it on the spool, same spool as you have pictured

The designer has replied

@clavo

There might be two reasons: - your filament isn't tuned for dimensional accuracy, or your filament shrinks (like when using PETG). - the spool diameter differs slightly, there are also spools with 185mm. Try to scale x/y axis to 101%

@bradleybates198

I bought like 10 rolls of this stuff before I realized the spools are a weird size...Its too tight for my 183mm diameter too but that doesn't mean the creator's didn't fit his on his X1C, I'm testing different percentages, I'll let yall know what works for a P1S soon...I'm trying 101% so if I don't follow up, it worked at 101%

(Edited)

The designer has replied

@clavo

Thanks for your feedback. Since the adapter rests exclusively on the contact surface of the spool, it must necessarily be tight-fit. Therefore, the used filamant must be tuned for dimensional accuracy. No room for tolerances. When using PETG or other filaments which are prone to shrinking, that should also be taken into account.

@ArmandoL

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 4 walls, 15% infill

it doesn't fit perfectly at first but if you sand it a little bit it works

The designer has replied

@clavo

Thanks for your feedback. If your spool has a diamter of 183mm, then probably the dimensional accuracy is not perfectly tuned for the used filament? I measured my printed adapters and they match the CAD model exactly. Since the adapter rests exclusively on the contact surface of the spool, it must necessarily be tight-fit. I'm pleased that the adapter fits with a little editing.

(Edited)

@vhart0

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 4 walls, 15% infill

I measured my spool diameter beforehand, it's the same as yours. But the adapter did not fit. I had to use my deburring tool on the spool to make it fit.

The designer has replied

@clavo

Thanks for your feedback. Then probably the dimensional accuracy is not perfectly tuned for the used filament? I measured my printed adapters and they match the CAD model exactly. Since the adapter rests exclusively on the contact surface of the spool, it must necessarily be tight-fit. I'm pleased that the adapter fits with a little editing.

(Edited)

@amadeo066

doesnt fit too. its to tight

The designer has replied

@clavo

As written below, there are also spools with a diameter of 185 mm (instead of 183 mm), please check yours. Try to scale up to 101% (x and y axis). I can also upload a model for 185 mm spools, but I can't test it, as all my spools have 183 mm.

@amadeo066

Replying to @clavo :

Also wenn ich messe dann habe ich 184 mm probiere es mal mit 101