简约版储物盒(Minimalist storage box)

Copyright Claim

简约版储物盒(Minimalist storage box)

Boost
2
4
0

Print Profile(1)

All
P1S
P1P
X1
X1 Carbon
X1E
A1

0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 15% infill
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 15% infill
Designer
17.7 h
4 plates

Open in Bambu Studio
Boost
2
4
0
0
10
0
Released

Description

When using 3D printing to create storage boxes, it is necessary to consider the amount of consumables used and the printing time. If the model design requires a lot of materials and time, it is better to purchase directly online.
I have designed this minimalist home storage box, including a medium box, a large box, and an extra large box.
To make it cheaper, the most important thing for printing storage boxes is to save consumables and minimize the amount of consumables used while ensuring strength. After multiple experiments, I have set the thickness of the storage box to the most suitable size.
Minimalist and aesthetically pleasing, eliminating any decorative elements and avoiding ineffective decorative voids,
It can be stacked flat, and this design can be stacked, ensuring that the sides are flush after stacking, making the outside look beautiful and simple. Among them, 4 medium boxes can be placed in extra large boxes.
To ensure printing efficiency, the size of the storage box should be maximized according to the size of the printer panel. In order to improve efficiency, a 256 * 256 printed version can print two at the same time. This means that users of the p1p p1s and x series can print one model in just 5-6 hours, and a simple storage box can be made in just one night

 

Video introduction to this model::

视频介绍这个模型:

 

 

 

使用3d打印的方式来制作储物盒,必须要考虑耗材的使用量盒打印时间,如果模型设计得很费材料和很消耗时间,那不如直接网上购买。

所有我设计了这套简约板的家用储物盒,包括 中盒、大盒和特大盒。

使它更便宜,打印储物盒最重要的事情是节省耗材,尽可能在保障强度得同时减少耗材用量,在经过多次试验,我把储物盒的厚度设置在一个最合适的尺寸。

简约美观,减去任何装饰要素,避免无效的装饰空洞,

可以齐平叠放,这款设计可以叠放,且叠放后可以保证侧面齐平,外面看上去好看简约。其中,4个中盒可以放入特大盒中。

保障打印效率,根据打印机面板尺寸,储物盒尺寸尽量做大,为了效率,256*256的的打印版可以同时打印两个,这意味p1p p1s 和x系列用户,可以刚好5-6小时打印一盘模型,利用一个晚上的时间就可以做一个简约的储物盒

Comment & Rating (0)

Please fill in your opinion
(0/5000)

No more