PTFE Y Tube Splitter - No PTFE fittings required

Remixed by

PTFE Y Tube Splitter - No PTFE fittings required

Remixed by
Boost
72
174
118

Print Profile(3)

All
P1P
P1S
X1
X1 Carbon
X1E
A1

0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
Designer
44 min
1 plate
4.7(73)

0.12mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
0.12mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
24 min
1 plate
4.4(20)

0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
20 min
1 plate
4.4(5)

Boost
72
174
118
1
789
515
Released

Description

I was using this Y splitter as was very simple

Bowden Y-Splitter for Bambu Lab X1 by ZzoyozZ | Download free STL model | Printables.com

 

However, as it was free to move around, filament would catch and kind of ping within the tube system.

I found a remix that put it in a box and I added holes to the box to pick up on the P1P PTFE coupler points as well as making it slimmer to be more in alignment with where the PTFE comes out of the printer.

It is now solid in place and it is very smooth when the AMS is loading.

 

Stand on to 2 opening end as per the original design.

Printed in PETG to try and make the smoothest filament path as PETG seem slippery compared to PLA.

0 infill required.

Printed with 3 walls and 4 top an bottom layers but this could be overkill as it is very strong.

 

isn't flat to the back of the P1P, overhangs the corner if you have a curved corner, but is within the width of the printer.

 

Bowden tubes just push in and for the months I was using the original design, with the filament catching, I never had a tube pop out. saves having to get hold of 3 PTFE tube fittings. Highly recommend the original model if you don't want to use this one.

 

I used 2 M3x12 screws to mount but i think a M3x10 will also work.

 

 

 

 

Comment & Rating (118)

Please fill in your opinion
(0/5000)

Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
nice
The designer has replied
0
Reply
I have a new version that n the remix section. that ptfe tube should be trimmed to get the damage off.
(Edited)
1
Reply
Replying to @PCHuDSoN :
thanx. the PTFE-Tube works fine for me, that you created there. your Splitter is the best intested yet!
0
Reply
Print Profile
0.12mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
perfect for what I wanted, printed with transparent petg. thank you
2
Reply
Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
I can't believe I waited so long to print one of these. Before I even installed I ran a rounded file through and when installed materials flow through no prob
The designer has replied
0
Reply
that’s the good thing about it, simple and effective. if you printed vertically is should be smooth anyway as the walls are paths.
0
Reply
Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
Printed ok and looked decent but I had to drill out the holes to get the PTDE tubes in all the way. Works good though
(Edited)
The designer has replied
0
Reply
that shouldn’t be the case as the holes are tapered. I would say have you calibrated your flow but as you have drilled out the problem is solved.
0
Reply
Print Profile
0.12mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
Looks ok, PTFE tube not staying in the hole while retracting
(Edited)
0
Reply
I would say thats because you have used the profile someone posted with it printing flat. For best results it should be standing on its end.
(Edited)
2
Reply
Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
works perfect
0
Reply
Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
The designer has replied
0
Reply
nice just a few wisps to clean off. I assume petg?
0
Reply
Replying to @PCHuDSoN :
yes indeed
0
Reply
Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
Funktioniert einwandfrei.
0
Reply
Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
I was printing some things in p.c. so I added this to the plate. works great and so smooth
The designer has replied
0
Reply
sounds good. got a photo?
0
Reply
Replying to @PCHuDSoN :
printed with bambu translucent black.
0
Reply
that gives a nice effect
0
Reply
Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 0% infill
sometimes PTFE tube falls out. still waiting for the original Hub. thank you!
(Edited)
0
Reply