SILENT PING PONG PADDLE - AIRLESS INFILL DESIGN - Free 3D Print Model

Search models, users, collections, and posts

engineericly

Hobby & DIY>Sport & Outdoors

IP Report

GIF

Print Profile(3)

All

X1 Carbon

P1S

P1P

X1E

H2D

H2D Pro

H2S

P2S

H2C

X2D

A2L

0.2mm layer, 5 walls, 15% infill

Designer

2.7 h

1 plate

4.4(19)

0.2mm layer, 5 walls, 15% infill

2.7 h

1 plate

5.0(1)

0.6mm nozzle, 0.3mm layer, 5 walls, 15% infill

3.1 h

1 plate

Open in Bambu Studio

Boost

129

225

734

109

Released

Description

You can print this ping pong paddle with custom infill types in your slicer.
Use 15% infill.
Make sure to set top and bottom layers to 0, with this way it will be "Airless" and it makes your paddle silent

I printed with three color combination using BambuLab AMS to resemble the real look of ping pong paddle.
For blade use PETG and for the handle I would recommend to use TPU, as it will be more grippy and durable.

There are separated and merged paddle stl files for easy paint or same color paint, respectively.

Here is the video about it: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C5asB9IL1Xx
Check my Patreon for commercial license: https://www.patreon.com/engineericly

silent ping pong paddle

ping pong paddle

Comment & Rating (47)

@MarzMakez

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 5 walls, 15% infill

My first time printing it, it was super weak, but I printed it again and put my name on it, it looked cool and works great!

@Griffincha

Boosted

Where did you find the handle?

@user_2393158440

Replying to @Griffincha :

In the STL file

Show original

@Griffincha

Boosted

Replying to @user_2393158440 :

Thank you

Show original

@Squatchbotics

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 5 walls, 15% infill

So. I like it, and it is pretty nearly there, but a few weaknesses still remain I think! Now, I did not print the blade in PETG, and I did not print the handle in TPU. Therefore, these would have resolved the friction fit of the handle quite a bit. But, this is a for a school play ground, and TPU flex plus PETG would have seen a fair amount of failure points. So I went with PLA Tough+ (as per the Bambu Paddle rackets!!!). The friction fit was more than horrific. A 1:1 fit with no tolerance or lead in. Material change caused this, but still I would have liked a better fit. Once encouraged in (sanding, edging, etc). A few tests and the bat worked well. But a weak point was created where the blade joins the handle. After playground uses of the bat, the weakness gave quite easily - which was surprising for PLA Tough+. I think I would extend the solid area into the blade a bit more, and rely less on the honeycomb structure. That aside, it is a great item, 4 for the slight weakness.