Search models, users, collections, and posts

Multiboard 8x8 Core and Border 10 Stack 0.4 & 0.6

Remixed by
IP Report

Print Profile(1)

All
P2S
H2C
H2S
H2D
A1
X2D
H2D Pro
A2L

0.6mm nozzle, 0.3mm layer, 3 walls, 15% infill
0.6mm nozzle, 0.3mm layer, 3 walls, 15% infill
Designer
61.2 h
2 plates
5.0(1)

Open in Bambu Studio
Boost
28
106
1
2
104
17
Released 

Bill of Materials

Bambu Filaments
Select all
Nature (65102) / Filament with spool / 0.5 kg
Matte Ivory White (11100) / Filament with spool / 1kg
Black (33102) / Filament with spool / 1 kg

Description

I recently started using the Multiboard ecosystem and very quickly came to the conclusion that I had zero desire to print them one at a time and wanted to reduce my print times as much as I could. As comparison, it is roughly 1d20h for 0.4 vs 1d6h for 0.6HF. 

 

Once I confirmed that the tolerances were good with 0.6 (I am able to use the Tight tolerance option for my Snaps, even with it printed in PETG-I strongly recommend printing a Demo or Learning Pack from the Multiboard site as a form of tolerance test before committing to a day+ worth of printing), I created some 10 stacks of the Core plates and the Border plates.

 

I printed mine in PETG with PLA as my support material and it all peeled apart in that satisfying way. Just slip the edge of a palette knife or scraper blade between the plates, twist the tiniest bit and they should quickly break apart with a pleasing crack. Lovely.

 

Each plate is 0.30mm from its neighbors, giving it the right amount of room for a support layer of the same thickness and all of the plates have had support blockers painted on to keep layer changes to a minimum; default Multiboard plates will place supports along the edges when printed in stacks, adding 20+ more filament changes, an extra hour of print time and requiring a bunch of annoying post-processing. Horrible.

 

Each of the plates starts with the number that represents its position in the stack to make it simple to remove plates for small prints. Just start deleting  at #10 and work your way down to the number you need. Easy.

 

If you want/need to print with a different nozzle size:

0.4 should work, but I haven't personally tested it 

0.8 looks like you'd end up with plates 5 and 6 bonded together due to the shuffling caused by the larger layer height, so I wouldn't print any more than five at once and double (check to make sure there is support showing between every plate after slicing). I would also personally be concerned about fitment with a 0.8 nozzle, definitely a situation calling for a tolerance print.

Comment & Rating (1)

(0/1000)