Search models, users, collections, and posts

Unsupported Bridge Test & Principle Explanation

Print Profile(3)

All
A1
A1 mini
P1S
P1P
X1
X1 Carbon
X1E

0.2mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
0.2mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
Designer
3.7 h
2 plates
4.9(8)

0.2mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
0.2mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
Designer
1.2 h
3 plates
5.0(4)

0.2mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
0.2mm layer, 2 walls, 15% infill
Designer
3.6 h
2 plates
5.0(3)

Open in Bambu Studio
Boost
123
265
22
5
455
151
Released 

Description

Principle (Based on G-code with S ≈ 0.378 mm)

Parameters (from this file):

 

Nozzle = 0.40 mm Bridge line width w = 0.42 mm Layer height h = 0.20 mm Base cross-section A0 = w*h = 0.084 mm² Measured bridge line spacing S ≈ 0.378 mm

Why default flow (1.0) sags:

  • In standard layers, the nozzle squishes filament, and about 15% overlap ensures adjacent lines fuse well.
  • During bridging, the filament is airborne and round, so at default flow its diameter is only:

     

    d ≈ sqrt((4*A0)/π) ≈ 0.327 mm

    This is smaller than the spacing (0.378 mm), so the lines can’t touch, causing sagging.

  • Normal Printing
  • Bridge Printing
  • Bridge Printing with Adjusted Flow

Flow rate calculation:

We want d ≈ S:

 

d ≈ sqrt((4*m*A0)/π) Let d = S = 0.378 => m ≈ (π*S²) / (4*A0) => m ≈ 1.336  (theoretical “just touching”)

Practical recommendation:

Real-world printing needs margin for airflow, vibration, and cooling effects.
Set bridge flow to 1.45–1.60× for a stable, clean bridge.

Even though your slicer uses ~10% overlap (spacing 0.378 mm), aiming slightly higher than the theoretical 1.33× ensures consistent adhesion and avoids weak spots.

Comment & Rating (22)

(0/1000)