Pastamatic Target Side Clip by andythilo

andythilo

3D Printer>3D Printer Accessories

Print Profile(2)

All

P1S

P1P

X1 Carbon

X1E

0.2mm layer, 7 walls, 15% infill

Designer

11 min

1 plate

5.0(45)

0.2mm layer, 7 walls, 15% infill

12 min

1 plate

5.0(3)

Boost

135

474

278

Released

Description

Designed around the excellent axis upgrade from Poli27 - https://makerworld.com/en/models/45217#profileId-46957

I wanted a simpler axis retention device allowing me to remove all the plastic pins and fix all gears with M5 bolts. This clip is easily removable, and is the only one needed. You can still use the printed pins if you want.

Designed to fit the Pastamatic arms from the print profile I used, which is the ‘2023.10 Single Plate w/ retainers 0.16mm, 2 walls, 5% Infill’ version. from the original - https://makerworld.com/en/models/16606#profileId-52226

pastamatic

Comment & Rating (58)

@Calminata

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 7 walls, 15% infill

works perfectly! nice job!

The designer has replied

@andythilo

Thanks!

@BurlySpain

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 7 walls, 15% infill

100👌🏻

The designer has replied

@andythilo

Thanks for the rating, looks great.

@Brant3D

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 7 walls, 15% infill

Works great

@Groucho

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 7 walls, 15% infill

Locks the spool in nicely and printed easily

@HerrFrodo

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 7 walls, 15% infill

printed perfectly and keeps the Axle in Place

@elRonaldo

Print Profile

0.2mm layer, 7 walls, 15% infill

Printed it twice. One original and one 95% for the other side. Wobbles a little, but it works. :-)

@Sareem

Printed fine and does the job. Old generic red pla.

@jonathaneheande

Nice model! Happen to have a smaller one that goes on the other end of the mandrel?

The designer has replied

@andythilo

I don’t sorry, the other side was different and I found it wasn’t needed

@elRonaldo

I asked myself the same question. But now I have printed the model again with 95% for the other side. It fits, but it wobbles a bit. Maybe 90-92% is better?