Trey's Designs

cover

Dry Pod Collection 2_cd6e6b83-acda-427e-934d-5ba4f0391d98.png

plate_1.png

Dry Pod Collection 1_2ec82c2e-1d27-49ea-93b6-7db2d4588c0a.webp

plate_1.webp

ams containers_50945362-e27c-43dd-b39d-683fd7c66ea4.webp

0.16mm layer, 6 walls, 20% infill

GGlockeFlow

2024-08-23_bc832f3950d67

WhatsApp Image 2024-08-23 at 15.54.04.jpeg

WhatsApp Image 2024-08-23 at 15.54.03.jpeg

Came out great. I kept all setting the same, just switched the center dry box for <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" href="https://makerworld.com/en/models/83909#profileId-89698">this</a> one with a circular oppening to fit the regular circular hygrometers you can buy on Amyon or Aliexpress. Hope it helps somebody! Happy printing :)

Full Set with Round Hygrometer

Fusion3D

20241116_131125.jpg

20241117_174612.jpg

0.16mm layer, 6 walls, 20% infill&nbsp;ChatGPT:When it comes to desiccant dry pods for the BambooLab AMS (or similar 3D printing systems that store filament in a controlled environment), both PLA and PET-G can work, but there are a few factors to consider when choosing the material: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Moisture Resistance (after printing): &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;•&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;PET-G is more moisture-resistant than PLA after printing. So, for a desiccant pod that needs to keep moisture out of the filament over time, PET-G would be a better choice. PLA is more prone to absorbing moisture over time, which could reduce the effectiveness of the pod, especially if it’s exposed to humid environments. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;2.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Strength and Durability: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;•&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;PET-G is generally more durable and flexible than PLA. If the desiccant pod needs to be strong enough to hold the desiccant and withstand some handling, PET-G would likely be superior, as it’s more resistant to cracking and breaking than PLA, which can be more brittle. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;3.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Ease of Printing: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;•&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;PLA is easier to print than PET-G, as it doesn’t require as high a printing temperature and has less warping issues. If you want to prioritize ease of printing and don’t need the extra durability or moisture resistance, PLA can be a good choice, but PET-G will hold up better over time. &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;4.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Chemical Resistance: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;•&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;PET-G is more chemical-resistant compared to PLA, so if you’re concerned about the pod interacting with the desiccant or other materials, PET-G could be a better option for long-term storage.Conclusion:For desiccant dry pods, PET-G would be the superior choice due to its greater moisture resistance, durability, and overall performance in protecting filament from moisture over time. PLA might be easier to print, but it won’t provide the same level of moisture protection or durability as PET-G once printed.&nbsp;Print Profile Musts:Calibration of your printer prior to printingDry filament or have &lt; 20% humidityDoor must be open during printing to allow proper coolingFans must be engaged to help purge heat during printing (adjust as needed to prevent warping)Washed build plate free of contaminants&nbsp;Print Profile recommendations:Textured PEI plate or tack plateUse of hairspray if textured PEI plate is not available

PETG Economy print profile

PrintingPabs

Print Profile.png

IMG_0068.jpg

Printed on the P1P using the 0.16 optimal setting. Key changes from original:<ul><li>Deleted the hydrometer container and the back containers for those who do not need it</li><li>Duplicated everything else so that two AMS units can be filled and printed at the same time (except for the middle container)</li></ul>Please note that there might be slight drooping on the larger containers handle at the cost of not wasting filament on support. Feel free to adjust as need for your specific printer.

P1P, 0.16mm layer, 6 walls, Two AMS No Hydrometer

ikwach

Screenshot 2025-03-18 at 4.29.39 am.png

Print this in PA6-GF and dry your Desiccant right with your pods! This is affordable engineering material that will love 120C and will get even stronger in your drying oven. <a target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer ugc" href="https://au.store.bambulab.com/products/pa6-gf">https://au.store.bambulab.com/products/pa6-gf</a><ul><li>Profile has an improvement to produce less stringing by avoiding crossing walls. </li><li>Round hygrometer. </li></ul>You need printer with enclosure to print PA6-GF, hence the selection of X1C/P1S/X1E. As for supports - I prefer using same material, because PA special support material from Bamboo must be removed asap after print otherwise it sticks very hard.  Big love, Sergei

PA6-GF tailored, no wall crossing, 0.16mm, 6 wall, 20% fill

lloydliu

AMS干燥盒 Drybox for AMS

I was tired of searching all over for all seven of the AMS desiccant containers so I compiled them all on one plate for EZ printing. I included the one that utilizes the rectangular hydrometer from amazon. Best results I have found was using a PLA-CF with Babmu PLA support material for the cleanest print.

AMS Dry Pod Collection - All 7 Slots

Jkaara

Screenshot 2024-10-06 000300.png

Screenshot 2024-10-06 000452.png

AMS Dry Pods - Aqara Temperature and Humidity

Patrbk21

20250103_142420.jpg

20250103_142541.jpg

Photo Tapo T310.jpg

HYGRO AMS DRY BOX HANDLE FULL SET ROUND/TAPO T310

ASIA

Print Profile(5)

Description

Comment & Rating (841)

This remix is based on

License

Remixes (5)

Related Models