Post - NEprintsPossible

Search models, users, collections, and posts

Recommendation

Creator’s Club

Creators & Fans

Show Your Make

Off Topic

Post Details

NEprintsPossible

@NEprints2

#ChildrensToys #Revive Maker World Should persons caught trying to bend/break the rules (#4&#6) by entering the competition with old, regurgitated models from previous competitions they entered into be allowed to still compete in the #ChildrensToys competition?

Should persons caught trying to bend/break the rules (#4&#6) by entering the competition with old, regurgitated models from previous competitions they entered into be allowed to still compete?

15%

Yes! Let them compete!

70%

NO! Don't let them compete!

15%

Undecided. I don't know

369 votes

Final results

Comment (37)

@rrkawa : I can't wait for the V3 model, with a brand new color. 😂

@PrinterBoy21 : the v2 is not the same regurgitated model just a improved one

The poster has replied

@NEprints2 : @gyroidlover : lol why are you so angry. I'm here for intellectual debate only. If a definition upsets, you that much I'm sorry but I'm not having a nonsensical argument with you about it. Go be mad at a Dictionary. "A remixed invention is a new creation that is derived from or built upon existing inventions, ideas, or technologies by selectively recombining, adapting, or transforming their components to produce something novel and distinct. It is essentially an invention that “remixes” prior art/model's —taking elements from multiple sources and reassembling them in a new way to achieve a similar or slightly different function, application, or effect".

@gyroidlover : @NEprints2 : Why dont you make your printed fabrics remixes of the thousands of similar models? I doubt you came up with the idea yourself. "creation that is derived from or built upon existing inventions, ideas, or technologies." Your definition is completely false.

@NEprints2 : Good to know we live in a day, and age where people believe definition's no longer hold meaning attached to the word. "A remixed invention is a new creation that is derived from or built upon existing inventions, ideas, or technologies by selectively recombining, adapting, or transforming their components to produce something novel and distinct. It is essentially an invention that “remixes” prior art/model's —taking elements from multiple sources and reassembling them in a new way to achieve a similar or slightly different function, application, or effect".

@NEprints2 : In the end, democracy will prove who is right and who is wrong. From the mouths of many, one collective truth.

@WunschStueck3D : i found other creators with same strategy. its clear against the rules... and unfair to any competitor...

@Michael_Yeung : i think yes but should be judged more harshly

@Michael_Yeung : for the wuestion

@albrt3D : Yo creo que si. Porque entoces tienes que hacer un modelo diferente cada vez que sale un concurso relacionado con el tema. Esa es mi opinión

@SaxLert : Esa es la gracia, tienes que hacer modelos nuevos, no reciclar todo lo posible el mismo modelo una y otra vez.

@PAT0_BANAN0 : The models in the contest are both version 2 so they are new and they can participate

The poster has replied

@PAT0_BANAN0 : @NEprints2 : Hahaha ok

@NEprints2 : @PAT0_BANAN0 : BTW I was disagreeing with you when I said I would love to see a car company release a new model with only a color change.... I wonder how well that would go over with a "True" ...... consumer......

@Happy3DLab : for two of the photos no but for the rest yes because on number three and four, they were made by different people not it was not the same person so you made a mistake in those two photos don’t judge me because I just found the same exact thing but when I looked closer, which one should do, it has different users

@CDBuilder : both fidget things were by the same person.

@user_3985486604 : Like @NEprints2 said it’s two separate people therefore two separate instances.

@jrojas28 : I don't think they should be able to compete however if we're talking rules here, I sadly think they're eligible to be there. Rule #4 is not speicfic (just say "not eligible" vs Rule #5 which says "not eligible for competition" - which means Rule #4 could be read as "not eligible for a reward", or whatever you see fit). Rule #6 says they're not eligible for winning. TLDR is neither rule really blocks them from participating / being on the front page. A shame really because it feels unfair but a reality nonetheless.

No more data