Lock Puzzle - Cryptex

Copyright Claim

Lock Puzzle - Cryptex

Boost
226
539
83
GIF

Print Profile(2)

All
A1 mini
P1S
P1P
X1
X1 Carbon
X1E
A1

0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 10% infill
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 10% infill
Designer
7.3 h
2 plates
4.5(31)

No AMS - 0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 10% infill
No AMS - 0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 10% infill
Designer
4.7 h
3 plates
4.7(12)

Open in Bambu Studio
Boost
226
539
83
62
679
367
Released

Description

Lock Puzzle - Cryptex

 

Discover the fascinating world of mechanics with this lock puzzle!

 

This unique 3D-printed puzzle offers an exciting challenge for all ages. The scroll features four rotating number dials, each displaying the numbers 0 to 9.

 

By setting a custom four-digit code, the hidden compartment inside is unlocked, perfect for storing small treasures or secret messages.

 

Whether as a brain teaser or a creative storage solution, the Number Scroll provides an interactive experience suitable for both young and old alike.

 

 

Installation:

Set your own code:

The number you want should line up with the slot

 

Assembling:

Insert the 4 dials and 3 spacers. Make sure that the spacer sits inside the slot of the dial.
Press the last spacer with the two pins in.
Rotate it 90 degrees so it matches the notch at the top.
Make sure all notches ar aligned.
Insert the inner shell.

 

Update 16.09.24: Changed the end piece so it´s not getting loose so easily.

 

Disclaimer: I'm not responsible for any damage to your device or any injury resulting from the use of this product. Please use and assemble with caution.

Comment & Rating (83)

Please fill in your opinion
(0/5000)

Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 10% infill
Printed nicely, and assembled easily. The only issue I have is it's a bit too easy to force open like it's not catching to actually lock
The designer has replied
2
Reply
Thank you for your feedback! I intentionally designed it that way so you can open it with a bit of force when you lost the code :)
0
Reply
Replying to @flex.53 :
Ah that makes sense! If you ever get the urge to make a design like the one seen in the Da Vinci Code I'd love to print that XD
1
Reply
Replying to @Bleakfiber :
That's actually where I got the inspiration from 😅
0
Reply
The fins/bumps on the 'key' are too short to even catch minimal friction. I get it if you want to be able force it apart, but this is ridiculous. make a key with higher bumps
0
Reply
I remixed the inner core because of this issue and fixed it. cant force it open (easily at least) https://makerworld.com/en/models/916630#profileId-878118
1
Reply
Replying to @Etl210 :
Awesome! That works MUCH better!
0
Reply
Print Profile
No AMS - 0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 10% infill
the fins are facing the wrong way, meaning the tray can be pulled out even if the numbers are wrong, which makes the whole product useless; nevertheless, the design is nice.
0
Reply
I remixed the inner core because of this issue and fixed it. cant force it open (easily at least) https://makerworld.com/en/models/916630#profileId-878118
0
Reply
Replying to @Etl210 :
cool thanks, ill check it out
0
Reply
This is truly an incredibly amazing model. Printed with the P1S using PLA (gold, silver), perfect result. It's easy to assemble. I will use it this weekend for a treasure hunt at K1's birthday party. Thank you!
The designer has replied
Show original
1
Reply
Thanks a lot!
0
Reply
This product is a not autorized copy of the original design of the year 2020! It has already been reported to the team. This is the original product: https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4490091
(Edited)
The designer has replied
0
Reply
A cryptex is a known mechanism. I have definitely never seen your model before and therefore have not copied it. We even have a different solution for the mechanism...
0
Reply
if you actually looked you would see its different
1
Reply
Printed in white PLA then colored in with metallic and black Sharpie. Amazing print - the biggest thing I've printed on my A1 mini so far. Couple of suggestions: - make the bitings on the inner key piece higher so it can't be forced - make the notches bevelled, so they don't have to line up perfectly - make the wheels slightly decagon shaped inside, so they "click" into place on each number I have no idea how to do this myself and it's already a great model!
The designer has replied
1
Reply
Thanks for the feedback! Looks really great :)
0
Reply
Boosted
I recently completed this 3D print to use as a 'gift wrapper' for someone that wanted to have money. The design is fantastic. However, I did notice that the inner container has about half a centimeter of play while the cryptex is locked. It might be worth addressing that gap for a tighter fit.If you’re planning to use different colors for the spacers between the numbered ring, just a quick tip: remember to place them on a separate plate before printing. Overall, this project was a joy to print—well thought out and executed beautifully. I highly recommend it to anyone looking for a fun project!
The designer has replied
1
Reply
Wow that's a great compliment. Thank you! I'm glad you like it :)
0
Reply
Boosted
Print Profile
0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 10% infill
amazing design, really love it
The designer has replied
1
Reply
Thanks, it looks great!
0
Reply
Boosted
Awesome, this is one of my favourite prints. thank you! One suggestion, the final ring holding the numbers together would come off pretty easy as I tried to unlock it, sometimes causing it to get stuck. It would also slip off pretty easy with minimal force. I ended up glueing it, now works perfectly, however i won’t be able to change the code. Maybe something to look at. Thanks again!
(Edited)
The designer has replied
1
Reply
Wow that looks great! I changed the end piece so it´s not getting loose so easily. Feel free to test the new one!
0
Reply
Print Profile
No AMS - 0.2mm layer, 3 walls, 10% infill
The rings were a bit too big, So I had to tape some on the inside. Also, the locking studs on the inner cylinder was a bit short. It could be perfect with some modifications. It turned out great otherwise. I put a whisky sample inside as a gift :)
0
Reply